P‐6 Double‐blinded comparative study of the efficacy of azithromycin and cephalexin in canine pyoderma
Identifieur interne : 008A09 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 008A08; suivant : 008A10P‐6 Double‐blinded comparative study of the efficacy of azithromycin and cephalexin in canine pyoderma
Auteurs : A. D. Blanco [Argentine] ; A. Wolberg [Argentine]Source :
- Veterinary Dermatology [ 0959-4493 ] ; 2004-08.
Abstract
A double‐blinded randomized, controlled study was carried out with the objective to evaluate the comparative efficacy of two antibiotics (azithromycin and cephalexin) in dogs with superficial pyoderma. Thirty‐seven dogs with clinical signs of superficial pyoderma were included in the study. The diagnosis of superficial pyoderma was based on history, clinical signs and cytology. The presence of underlying diseases was investigated through complementary diagnostic methods after clinical resolution of the pyoderma. Animals were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: cephalexin 30 mg/kg twice daily for 21 days, or azithromycin 20 mg/kg twice daily for 21 days. Response to therapy was considered to be satisfactory if complete recovery was achieved by day 14 of treatment. The effects of the two treatments were compared using the chi‐square test. Twenty dogs received cephalexin and 17 received azithromycin. Nineteen of 20 dogs treated with cephalexin achieved complete recovery on day 14, with no side effects reported. Ten of 17 dogs treated with azithromycin achieved complete recovery on day 14, but therapy was discontinued in one dog because of vomiting. Cephalexin was significantly more effective than azithromycin (P = 0.0077). Azithromycin may be a therapeutic alternative in those patients in which cephalexin cannot be used. Funding: Self‐funded.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2004.00414_6.x
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 007818
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 007818
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 001E93
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 008C73
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 008A09
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">P‐6 Double‐blinded comparative study of the efficacy of azithromycin and cephalexin in canine pyoderma</title><author><name sortKey="Blanco, A D" sort="Blanco, A D" uniqKey="Blanco A" first="A. D." last="Blanco">A. D. Blanco</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wolberg, A" sort="Wolberg, A" uniqKey="Wolberg A" first="A." last="Wolberg">A. Wolberg</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:FFE06BCC8454F778BB94DAA5229B9C5AB95DFC95</idno><date when="2004" year="2004">2004</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3164.2004.00414_6.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/FFE06BCC8454F778BB94DAA5229B9C5AB95DFC95/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007818</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007818</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">007818</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">001E93</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001E93</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0959-4493:2004:Blanco A:p:double:blinded</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">008C73</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">008A09</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">008A09</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">P‐6
Double‐blinded comparative study of the efficacy of azithromycin and cephalexin in canine pyoderma</title><author><name sortKey="Blanco, A D" sort="Blanco, A D" uniqKey="Blanco A" first="A. D." last="Blanco">A. D. Blanco</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Argentine</country><wicri:regionArea>College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Capital Federal</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Capital Federal</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wolberg, A" sort="Wolberg, A" uniqKey="Wolberg A" first="A." last="Wolberg">A. Wolberg</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Argentine</country><wicri:regionArea>College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Capital Federal</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Capital Federal</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Veterinary Dermatology</title><title level="j" type="alt">VETERINARY DERMATOLOGY</title><idno type="ISSN">0959-4493</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-3164</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">15</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="42">42</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="42">42</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2004-08">2004-08</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0959-4493</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0959-4493</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">A double‐blinded randomized, controlled study was carried out with the objective to evaluate the comparative efficacy of two antibiotics (azithromycin and cephalexin) in dogs with superficial pyoderma. Thirty‐seven dogs with clinical signs of superficial pyoderma were included in the study. The diagnosis of superficial pyoderma was based on history, clinical signs and cytology. The presence of underlying diseases was investigated through complementary diagnostic methods after clinical resolution of the pyoderma. Animals were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: cephalexin 30 mg/kg twice daily for 21 days, or azithromycin 20 mg/kg twice daily for 21 days. Response to therapy was considered to be satisfactory if complete recovery was achieved by day 14 of treatment. The effects of the two treatments were compared using the chi‐square test. Twenty dogs received cephalexin and 17 received azithromycin. Nineteen of 20 dogs treated with cephalexin achieved complete recovery on day 14, with no side effects reported. Ten of 17 dogs treated with azithromycin achieved complete recovery on day 14, but therapy was discontinued in one dog because of vomiting. Cephalexin was significantly more effective than azithromycin (P = 0.0077). Azithromycin may be a therapeutic alternative in those patients in which cephalexin cannot be used. Funding: Self‐funded.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Argentine</li></country></list><tree><country name="Argentine"><noRegion><name sortKey="Blanco, A D" sort="Blanco, A D" uniqKey="Blanco A" first="A. D." last="Blanco">A. D. Blanco</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Wolberg, A" sort="Wolberg, A" uniqKey="Wolberg A" first="A." last="Wolberg">A. Wolberg</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/LymphedemaV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 008A09 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 008A09 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= LymphedemaV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:FFE06BCC8454F778BB94DAA5229B9C5AB95DFC95
|texte= P‐6 Double‐blinded comparative study of the efficacy of azithromycin and cephalexin in canine pyoderma
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |